Download Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language by Raoul Moati PDF

By Raoul Moati

Maureen Chun (Translator), Timothy Attanucci (Translator), Jean-Michel Rabaté (Foreword)

Raoul Moati intervenes within the severe debate that divided famous philosophers within the mid-twentieth century. within the Nineteen Fifties, the British thinker J. L. Austin complicated a conception of speech acts, or the "performative," that Jacques Derrida and John R. Searle interpreted in essentially other ways. Their confrontation founded at the factor of intentionality, which Derrida understood phenomenologically and Searle learn pragmatically. the debate had profound implications for the advance of latest philosophy, which, Moati argues, can revenue vastly by way of returning to this vintage debate.

In this ebook, Moati systematically replays the ancient come across among Austin, Derrida, and Searle and the disruption that prompted the lasting holiday among Anglo-American language philosophy and continental traditions of phenomenology and its deconstruction. the most important factor, Moati argues, isn't really even if "intentionality," an idea derived from Husserl's phenomenology, can or can't be associated with Austin's speech-acts as outlined in his groundbreaking tips on how to Do issues with phrases, yet really the emphasis Searle put on the performativity and made up our minds pragmatic values of Austin's speech-acts, while Derrida insisted at the hint of writing in the back of each act of speech and the iterability of indicators in numerous contexts.

Reviews:

In its very violence, the controversy among Jacques Derrida and John Searle used to be the evidence of the space that keeps to split the continental speculative culture from its Anglo-Saxon analytic counterpart. Raoul Moati's e-book is way greater than a evaluation of the talk -- he's a part of the controversy, bringing it to its philosophical end. occasionally, whereas studying his e-book, one has the sensation that Derrida and Searle engaged of their debate in order that Moati may well write his e-book on them, within the related manner that, for Hegel, the Peloponnesian warfare used to be fought in order that Thucydides may perhaps write his vintage publication on it.

(Slavoj Žižek)

Derrida and Searle's disagreement divided as soon as and for all philosophical debate and department with results that most likely exceeded either masters' predictions. the truth that this debate by no means came about (considering that Searle and Derrida by no means met in my opinion and the previous additionally refused to reprint one in every of his responses in an edited assortment) makes Moati's textual content fairly beneficial in reconstructing the historical past of this well-known dispute.

(Santiago Zabala, ICREA learn Professor of Philosophy on the college of Barcelona)

A very wonderful reconstruction of the philosophical conflict among well known giants of continental and American philosophies.

(Thibaut Gress, ActuPhilosophia)

There are virtually no different reviews of this controversy both in France or within the usa; at the very least, there's no different booklet that i do know approximately in this subject. The discussion among Searle and Derrida relating Austin's concept at the 'performative' or 'speech acts' has been, because it have been, resurrected by means of Moati -- and it truly is interesting. by way of focusing so strictly on a restricted sequence of polemical texts, Moati does greater than offer a sophisticated clarification of the ancient divergence among Austin, Searle, and Derrida, he permits us to appreciate the very roots of an enduring false impression among Anglo-American language philosophy and continental traditions of phenomenology.

(Jean-Michel Rabaté, collage of Pennsylvania, member of the yankee Academy of Arts and Sciences)

Moati's paintings is a true step forward. He is helping us make feel of the very contrast among so-called analytic and continental philosophies. the outstanding readability of his kind, the accuracy of his analyses shed a totally new gentle on either authors and the character in their quarrel. He offers deep perception into Derrida's view and Searle's, addressing their universal presuppositions. the end result of such an independent technique is a very new figuring out of the modern philosophical panorama. it's going to turn out valuable for philosophers of language and brain, in addition to for metaphysicians, and for everybody who desires to comprehend the large philosophical divide that has characterised the prior fifty years.

(Jocelyn Benoist, collage of Paris-I, Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Show description

Read or Download Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language PDF

Similar linguistics books

Test Your Professional English - Bus General

This functional sequence contains a variety of professional titles which support scholars speak extra successfully. each one ebook comprises over 60 assessments and over 500 key phrases and expressions. they're excellent for sophistication use or self-study.

Extra info for Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language

Sample text

Searle, possesses the truth about Austin), needs to stick a copyright on his text. If Searle is fundamentally right, if he represents what is “obviously true,” his reply is no longer his own. 14 Moreover, Derrida devotes his attention to the acknowledgments contained in Searle’s reply, where he thanks Hubert Dreyfus and David Searle (“This is the first note of the Reply”). This exposes a second contradiction in the use of the copyright, that of the improbability of the exclusive paternity of Searle’s reply.

26 The vocabulary here is clearly phenomenological, revelatory of the way in which deconstruction systematically exposes the wheels of the phenomenological intentionality behind signification, representing the last avatar of voluntarism that dresses up Western metaphysics. If deconstruction is perfectly coherent as it applies to phenomenology, it is on the other hand more doubtful that it can be applied harmlessly to theories of meaning, primarily to Austin’s theory, which has no connection to phenomenology.

The transition from oral communication to written communication—which implies the material inscription of the message and its maintenance beyond the moment of its production—does not affect in any way the mechanism of the communicative transmission. ” In other words, writing amounts to the undamaged relay of face-to-face communication. Such a system is thus necessarily built on a continualist and isomorphic conception of writing. For this, writing employs a power of communication identical to that of concrete speech and gesture.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 32 votes